Multicriterial analysis in selecting a waste management system in region


Abstract

Introduction. The implementation of the European Union regulations into Polish law resulted in the establishment of such methods of dealing with waste in order to comply with the requirements of environmental protection and waste management plans. Each time the construction of another plant is a social and economic problem, therefore, the enhancement of the form and shape of such a system requires justification. The basic task of municipal waste management is to create technical conditions for the collection, transport, recovery, recycling and disposal of waste. The technical correctness of the system and the scope of the adverse impact resulting in lowering ecological, aesthetic and cultural values ​​will decide about its capital expenditure and operating costs. The large number of imposed, overlapping, and often conflicting goals means that finding a favourable solution and decisively accepting it is a very difficult task, often requiring a compromise. The solution will be based on searching for the shape of a waste management system that, under existing restrictions, will ensure the best possible implementation of specific objectives under the specific conditions of the region.

Aim and tasks. The aim of the article is to present the multicriteria analysis method as a tool for analysis and selection of the waste management system in the region. In the multicriteria analysis for the selection of the most beneficial solution, it is necessary to find a function integrating individual objectives into one overall assessment. However, it is possible to choose only one solution - a compromise, and then a consistent implementation of the tasks of the chosen scenario. The presented analysis presents an example for a large city in Poland - Krakow.

Research results. The result of the presented calculations is the presentation of the assessment method for various waste management scenarios in the technical, socio-political and economic aspects. Such an assessment allows for an objective comparison between the presented waste management scenarios.

Conclusions. The result of the presented methodology of multi-criteria evaluation and analysis is the selection of the most advantageous solution of the waste management system. The presented system was assessed in a multi-aspect manner and the result allows to indicate the best solution in the presented assumptions and limitations. The method is universal and can be used for other waste management and environmental management systems.

Keywords:

multi-criteria analysis, solid waste, waste management, municipal waste.

References

1. Directive 2008/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 November 2008 on waste and repealing certain Directives.
2. The Act of 14 December 2012 on waste (Journal of law 2013, item. 21) [in Polish].
3. The Act of 28 November 2013 about maintaining cleanliness and order in communes (Journal of law 2013, item. 1399) [in Polish].
4. Strategic Assessment of the Waste Management System of the City of Cracow along with the selection of variants of the location of the municipal waste thermal treatment plant (2007). Kraków: Rada Miasta Krakowa.
5. Generowicz, A., Kulczycka, J., Kowalski, Z., & Banach, M. (2011). Assessment of waste management technology using BATNEEC options, technology quality method and multi-criteria analysis. Journal of Environmental Management, 92(4) (2011) 1314-1320.
6. Mucha, Z., Generowicz, A., Wójcik, W., Jóźwiakowski, K., & Baran, S. (2016). Application of multi-criterial analysis to evaluate the method of utilization of sludge from small wastewater treatment plants with sustainable development of rural areas. Environment Protection Engineering, 42(4) (2016) 97-105.
7. Belton, V., & Stewart, T. (2002). Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis. An Integrated Approach. Kluwer Academic Publisher.
8. Generowicz, A. Kowalski, Z. Kulczycka, J. Banach, M. (2011). Assessment of technological solutions of municipal waste management using technology quality indicators and multicriteria analysis. Przemysł Chemiczny 90(5,) 747 – 753 [in Polish].
9. Generowicz, A., Kowalski, Z., Makara, A., &Banach, M. (2012). The application of multi-criteria analysis in the management of waste in Cracow, Polan. Waste Management 32, 349-351.
10. Kiker, G. A., Bridges T. S., Varghese, A., & Seager, T. P. Linkov I. (2005). Application of multicriteria decision analysis in environmental decision making. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management, 1(2), 95-108.
11. Jóźwiakowski, K., Mucha, Z., Generowicz, A., Baran, S., Bielińska, J., & Wójcik. W. (2015). The use of multi-criteria analysis for selection of technology for a household WWTP compatible with sustainable development. Archives of Environmental Protection, 41(3), 76–82.
12. Erkut, E., Karagiannidis, A., Perkoulidis, G., & Tjandra, S. A. (2008). A multicriteria facility location model for municipal solid waste management in North Greece. European Journal of Operational Research, 187, 1402–1421.
13. Aragonés-Beltrána, P., Mendoza-Rocab, J.A., Bes-Piáa, A., García-Melónb, M., & Parra-Ruizb, E. (2009). Application of multicriteria decision analysis to jar-test results for chemicals selection in the physical–chemical treatment of textile wastewater. J. Hazardous Materials, 164, 288–295.
14. Miejskie Przedsiębiorstwo Oczyszczania. http://www.mpo.krakow.pl
15. Linkov, I., Satterstrom, F.K., Kiker, G., Batchelor, C., Bridges, T., & Ferguson, E. (2006). From comparative risk assessment to multi-criteria decision analysis and adaptive management: Recent developments and applications. Environment International, 32, 1072–1093.
16. Hokkanen, J., & Salminen, P. (1997). Choosing a solid waste management system using multicriteria decision analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 98, 19-36.
17. Morrissey, A.J., & Browne, J. (2004). Waste management models and their application to sustainable waste management. Waste Management, 24, 297-308.
Published
2018-06-28
How to Cite
(1)
Generowicz, A. Multicriterial Analysis in Selecting a Waste Management System in Region. Economics Ecology Socium 2018, 2, 30-42.
Section
Natural resource economics