Impact of Bank Size on Its Financial Indicators in Bulgaria
Abstract
Introduction. One of the frequently used criteria for classifying banks is according to their size. The question of the existence of a dependence between the size of credit institutions, on the one hand, and their financial condition and results of activity, on the other hand, was logically raised. In recent years, this issue has increased its significance in Bulgaria against the background of the following circumstances: first, a process of consolidation of the banking sector in the country has begun; second, the new dimensions of the macroprudential policy impose higher regulatory requirements on banks, according to Basel III regulations; third, there is a significant number of relatively small credit institutions whose activity has a relatively limited scope; fourth, weak economic activity and low rate of economic growth of the country; fifth, the search for ways to increase the efficiency of banking activity.
Aim and tasks. The aim of the research is to establish the extent to which the size of the credit institutions in the country has an impact on various aspects of banking activity, as well as the strength of this impact. The subject of the study is focused on delineating the comparative advantages and disadvantages of big and small banks in terms of the scale of their operations.
Results. The analysis is based on information on the status and results of the activities of 18 banks in Bulgaria. The study covers observations on the development of the banking sector in 2020 and 2021. When specifying the size of banks, the traditional criterion is used, which is most often used to determine their size, namely the amount of their assets. It examines the impact of the size of credit institutions on 7 financial indicators reflecting different aspects of banking activity: Return on Assets, Efficiency of Administrative Costs, Staff Productivity, Asset Quality, Asset risk rating, Liquidity Coverage Ratio, Total Capital Ratio. On this basis, a correlation analysis is made, in which the correlation coefficient is used as the statistical measure of the dependence between the size of credit institutions (the assets), on the one hand, and their financial indicators, on the other hand. In parallel, the average values of the analyzed indicators for the respective years are calculated separately for each group of banks.
Conclusions. There is reason to claim that one of the possible instruments for increasing the efficiency of the banking sector in the country is its further consolidation. Of course, the conclusions drawn are not universal. This reflects the specifics of the banking industry in Bulgaria and the specifics of the period to which the analyzed data refer. With almost all analyzed indicators, a strong or moderate dependence between the size of the banks and the values of the considered financial indicators is outlined. This dependence is most pronounced in relation to the Return on Assets– as the size of credit institutions increases, the return on their assets increases significantly. The values with credit institutions with a wider scale of activity are better, which gives them visible advantages over other smaller banks.
Keywords:
assets, size of bank, financial indicators, credit institutions, banking sector consolidation.References
Aladwan, M. (2015). The impact of bank size on profitability: An empirical study on listed Jordanian commercial banks. European Scientific Journal, 11(34).
AlFadhli, М., AlAli, М. (2021). The Effect of Bank Size on Financial Performance: A Case Study on Kuwaiti Banks. Journal of Insurance and Financial Management, 4(3).
Arif, M., Khan, M. Z., & Iqbal, M. (2013). Impact of Bank Size on Profitability: Evidence From Pakistan. International Journal of Applied Research, 2(3).
BNB (2022). Bank Supervision. Retrieved from https://www.bnb.bg/BankSupervision/index.htm (accessed: 13 November 2022)
Chaudhary, M.K. (2021). The impact of knowledge management and human resources strategies on the Nepalese banks’ efficiency. Access to science, business, innovation in digital economy, ACCESS Press, 2(1): 78-90. https://doi.org/10.46656/access.2021.2.1(6)
Demirgüç-Kunt, А. &,Huizinga, Н. (2012). Do we need big banks? Evidence on performance, strategy and market discipline ments. Bank for International Settlements. Retrieved from https://www.bis.org/
European Banking Authority. (2022). Risk Dashboard. Retrieved from https://www.eba.europa.eu
European Commission. (2013). Regulation (EU) No 575/2013. Regulation (EU) No of the European Parliament and of the Council on prudential requirements for credit institutions and investment firms. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2013/575/oj
Koch, T., S. MacDonald. (2015). Bank Management (8th Edition). Cengage Learning.
Laeven, L., Ratnovski, L., & Tong, H. (2016). Bank size, capital, and systemic risk: Some international evidence. Journal of Banking & Finance, 69, 25-34.
Nelly, К., Ambrose, J., & George, K. (2019). Bank Size and Financial Risk Exposure on Financial Performance of Commercial Banks in Kenya. International Journal of Financial Research, 10(6), 250-264. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijfr.v10n6p250
Odinokova, T., Bozhinova, M., & Petrova, M. (2018). Promotion of Innovative Entrepreneurship Under Sustainable Development. E3S Web Conferences, 41, 04015. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20184104015
Parvin, S., Chowdhury, A. N. M. M. H., Siddiqua, A., & Ferdous, J. (2019). Effect of Liquidity and Bank Size on the Profitability of Commercial Banks in Bangladesh. Asian Business Review, 9(1), 7-10. https://doi.org/10.18034/abr.v9i1.219
Rybalkin, O. (2022). Sustainable development goals progress in the European Union: correlation with EEPSE green economy index. Access to science, business, innovation in digital economy, 3(2), 121-135. https://doi.org/10.46656/access.2022.3.2(3)
Sinkey, J. (2002). Commercial Bank Financial Management in the Financial-services Industry. New Jersey.
Terraza, V. (2015). The effect of bank size on risk ratios: Implications of banks’ performance. Procedia Economics and Finance, 30, 903-909. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(15)01340-4
Tharu, N. K., & Shrestha, Y. M. (2019). The influence of bank size on profitability: An application of statistics. International Journal of Financial, Accounting, and Management, 1(2), 81-89. https://doi.org/10.35912/ijfam.v1i2.82
Tran, D., & Phan, H. (2020). Bank Size, Credit Risk and Bank Profitability in Vietnam. Malaysian Journal of Economic Studies, 57(2), 233–251. https://doi.org/10.22452/MJES.vol57no2.4
Varotto, S., & Zhao, L. (2018). Systemic risk and bank size. Journal of International Money and Finance(82).
Vatev, Z. (2017). Influence of the Scale Effect Upon the Financial Results of the Banks in Bulgaria. Finance: Theory and Practice, 21(4).
Zagorodnya, A., Chernukha N., & Petrova, M. (2020). Contemporary trends of professional training specialists in the economic field at higher education institutions of Poland and Ukraine. Strategies for Policy in Science and Education, 28(3), 249-260.
If the article is accepted for publication in the journal «Economics. Ecology. Socium» the author must sign an agreementon transfer of copyright. The agreement is sent to the postal (original) or e-mail address (scanned copy) of the journal editions.
