Social Economy and the Transition Towards Circular Economy: a Survey Based Approach
Abstract
Introduction. European social economy employment is 6.3% of the European Union's (EU) working population. In Romania and other recent EU member states, it is responsible for less than 2% of the total employment. The need for a precise legal and political concept of social economy and social enterprise confused the Romanian population and made their measurement easier. Both concepts have been increasingly employed in Romania since 2005, following the new EU policy approaches for social inclusion. Consequently, the social economy has grown significantly in recent years, with a diverse range of actors pursuing various social goals.
Aim and tasks. The paper aims to provide an up-to-date overview of the social economy in Romania by showing the activity types and their involvement in the circular economy transition and then by examining the social enterprises' social and economic performance.
Results. The creation of social value and social impact of social enterprises, the response of organisations to entrepreneurial change, and the level of risk-taking were substantiated. The way these aspects are correlated with performance was determined. A quantitative analysis of the social economy and transition towards a circular economy in Romania yielded the following main findings: i) more than half of the surveyed enterprises did not understand the concept of a circular economy, and ii) there was a strong statistically significant correlation (R=0.61) between social performance and environmental receptivity. The correlation between social and economic performance is statistically significant, with an average intensity (R=0.32). The correlation between economic performance and responsiveness to the environment was also statistically significant for medium-to-high intensity (R= 0.28).
Conclusions. The social economy puts social and democratic objectives into practice, whereas a circular economy is essential for a sustainable transition. Various actors operate in different industries and geographic areas in the Romanian social economy. Social economy actors aim to contribute to a more inclusive economy and equitable society, inspiring the government and private sector to demonstrate and implement more inclusive and sustainable practices. These practices cover decent labour, more education, and secure lives. Social innovation, defined as long-term solutions to social problems, is a critical way to build a circular society.
Keywords:
social economy, circular economy, social enterprises, sustainable development, social inclusion.References
Amui, L. B. L., Jabbour, C. J. C., de Sousa Jabbour, A. B. L., & Kannan, D. (2017). Sustainability as a dynamic organizational capability: a systematic review and a future agenda toward a sustainable transition. Journal of Cleaner Production, 142, 308-322. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.07.103
Bansal, P. (2005). Evolving sustainably: A longitudinal study of corporate sustainable development. Strategic Management Journal, 26(3), 197-218. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.441
Bercea, O. B., Lakatos, E. S., & Bacali, L. (2019). Comparative Study Regarding Organizational Culture: Nonprofit Organization and Profit-Oriented Organization. In Civil Society: The Engine for Economic and Social Well-Being: The 2017 Griffiths School of Management and IT Annual Conference on Business, Entrepreneurship and Ethics (GMSAC) (pp. 41-52). Springer International Publishing.
Bromley, D. W. (1989). Economic interests and institutions: the conceptual foundations of public policy. New York and Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Department for Business, Innovation & Skills (DBIS). (2024). https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/department-for-business-innovation-skills
Elkington, J. (2018). 25 years ago I coined the phrase “triple bottom line.” Here’s why it’s time to rethink it. Harvard Business Review, 25, 2-5.
Epstein, M. J. (2010). Thinking straight about sustainability. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 8(3), 51-55.
European Commission. (2021). Employment, Social Affairs & Inclusion, Social Economy Action Plan.
European Commission. (2023). Social economy: Commission proposes ways to harness its full potential for jobs, innovation and social inclusion.
Gao, J., & Bansal, P. (2013). Instrumental and integrative logics in business sustainability. Journal of Business Ethics, 112(2), 241–255. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1245-2
Global Reporting Initiative. (2002). Sustainability Reporting Guidelines. Boston.
Haas, W., Krausmann, F., Wiedenhofer, D., & Heinz, M. (2015). How circular is the global economy?: An assessment of material flows, waste production, and recycling in the European Union and the world in 2005. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 19(5), 765-777. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12244
Hahn, T., Preuss, L., Pinkse, J., & Figge, F. (2014). Cognitive frames in corporate sustainability: Managerial sensemaking with paradoxical and business case frames. Academy of Management Review, 39(4), 463-487. http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/amr.2012.0341
Kraus, S., Breier, M., Jones, P., & Hughes, M. (2019). Individual entrepreneurial orientation and intrapreneurship in the public sector. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 15, 1247-1268. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-019-00593-6
Lakatos, E. S., Bercea, O. B., & Bacali, L. (2016). The concept of innovation in social economy. A review and a research agenda. Review of Applied Socio-Economic Research, 11(1), 32-50.
Lambru, M., & Petrescu, C. (2012). Trends and Challenges for Social Enterprises in Romania. International Review of Social Research, 2(2).
Lambru, M., & Petrescu, C. (2019). Social enterprises and their ecosystems in Europe. Country report Romania. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
Millar, N., McLaughlin, E., & Börger, T. (2019). The circular economy: swings and roundabouts? Ecological Economics, 158, 11-19.
Moreau, V., Sahakian, M., Van Griethuysen, P., & Vuille, F. (2017). Coming full circle: why social and institutional dimensions matter for the circular economy. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 21(3), 497-506. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12598
OECD. (2022). Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. Social economy and the COVID-19 crisis: current and future roles. https://read.oecd-ilibrary.org
Oprea, S.V., Bâra, A. and Ifrim, G. (2018). Flattening the electricity consumption peak and reducing the electricity payment for residential consumers in the context of smart grid by means of shifting optimization algorithm. Computers & Industrial Engineering, Volume 122, 125-139.
Polanyi, K. (2001). The great transformation: The political and economic origins of our time. Beacon Press.
Rodríguez-Espíndola, O., Cuevas-Romo, A., Chowdhury, S., Díaz-Acevedo, N., Albores, P., Despoudi, S., ... & Dey, P. (2022). The role of circular economy principles and sustainable-oriented innovation to enhance social, economic and environmental performance: Evidence from Mexican SMEs. International Journal of Production Economics, 248, 108495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2022.108495
Schoer, K., Weinzettel, J., Kovanda, J., Giegrich, J., & Lauwigi, C. (2012). Raw material consumption of the European Union–concept, calculation method, and results. Environmental science & technology, 46(16), 8903-8909.
Su, B., Heshmati, A., Geng, Y., & Yu, X. (2013). A review of the circular economy in China: moving from rhetoric to implementation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 42, 215-227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.11.020
WCED. (1987). World Commission on Environment and Development. Our common future. New York, Oxford University.
If the article is accepted for publication in the journal «Economics. Ecology. Socium» the author must sign an agreementon transfer of copyright. The agreement is sent to the postal (original) or e-mail address (scanned copy) of the journal editions.
