Perceived quality management of educational services from the perspective of parents as stakeholders

Lidija Kodrin

doi:10.31520/2616-7107/2020.4.1-5

Lidija Kodrin Ljubljana School of Business, Ljubljana, Slovenia http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6808-0674

DOI: https://doi.org/10.31520/2616-7107/2020.4.1-5

Abstract

Introduction. Quality is crucial for education as competition in the education services market is steadily intensifying. The critical attitude of participants in education requires improving the quality of work of educational organizations, their effectiveness and efficiency. Those educational organizations wishing to maintain or improve their position in the market are forced to work intensively to improve their work and increase their responsiveness to the needs of users. Secondary schools need to be aware that the ultimate arbiter of quality of the educational services they provide are stakeholders (parents) as one of primary customers of educational services.

Aim and tasks. The objective of the study is to determine the dimensions of the expected and perceived quality of educational services from parents’ perspective and to identify if they coincide with the dimensions in the classical gap model. Qualitative research that provides insight into the perspectives of parents on the quality of educational services and their understanding of the quality concepts was conducted.

Results. Based on the results of preliminary qualitative research, we have drawn up dimensions of perceived and expected quality of educational services: environment, reliability, responsiveness, assurance and empathy. The dimensions obtained through the focus group discussion of parents correspond to the dimensions in the classical GAP Model of Service Quality. Elements of assessment of parents' expectations and perception of the quality of educational services are considered (dimensions, tangibles, reliability, responsiveness, assurance, empathy).

Conclusions. The objective of this study was to identify the expectations and perceptions of parents as primary customers of educational services. The insight into the perspectives of parents on the quality of educational services and their understanding of the quality concepts was obtained with qualitative. Further on the dimensions of the expected and perceived quality of educational services from parents’ perspective were identified. It was confirmed that the dimensions identified in this research coincide with the dimensions in the classical gap model. Based on the results of the parents’ focus group and the original SERVQUAL instrument the questionnaire was designed and used in further research.

Keywords:

management, education, services, perceived quality, stakeholders.

References

REFERENCES
1. Zeithaml, V, Parasuraman, A., & Berry, L. L. (1990). Delivering Quality Service: Balancing Customer Perceptions and Expectations. London: Collier Macmillan.
2. Schlechty, P. C. (1990). Schools for The 21st Century: Leadership Imperatives For Educational Reform. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
3. Zeithaml, V. A., Bitner, M. J., Gremler, D. D. (2018). Services Marketing: Integrating Customer Focus Across the Firm. New York: Mcgraw–Hill Education.
4. Zeithaml, V. A., & Bitner, M. J. (2003). Services Marketing: Integrating Customer Focus Across the Firm. Boston: Mcgraw–Hill/Irwin.
5. Kodrin, L. (2007). Trženjsko zagotavljanje kakovosti izobraževalnih storitev: model za presojo kakovosti izobraževalnih storitev v srednjih šolah: doktorska disertacija. Ljubljana: Ekonomska fakulteta.
6. Tavčar Mitja I. (1999). Razsežnosti managementa in managerski procesi. Koper: Visoka šola za management.
7. Harvey, J. A., & Busher, H. (1996). Marketing Schools and Customer Choice. International Journal of Educational Management, 10(4), 26–32.
8. Davies, B., & Ellison, L. (2001). Strategic Direction And Development Of The School. London: Routledge.
9. Trnavčevič Anita Zupanc Grom, R. (2000). Marketing v izobraževanju. Ljubljana, Šola za ravnatelje.
10. Bridges D., & Mclaughlin, T.H. (1994). Education and The Market Place. London: The Falmer Press.
11. Kolar, T. (2003). Zadovoljstvo uporabnikov s klicnimi centri – konceptualni model in empirična preverba. Doktorska disertacija. Ljubljana: Ekonomska fakulteta 2003.
12. Malhotra, N. K., Nunan, D. Birks, D. F., & Wills, P. (2017). Marketing Research: An Applied Orientation Published. Prentice Hall Inc.
13. Churchill, G. A. Jr., Iacobucci, D. (2005). Marketing Research: Methodological Foundations. South Western: Thompson.
14. Flick, U. (2002). An Introduction To Qualitative Research. London: Sage Publications.
15. McDaniel, C. Jr., & Sates, R. (1998). Marketing Research Essential. Cincinatti, Ohio: Southwestern College Publishing.
16. Churchill, G. A., & Brown, T. J. (2003). Basic Marketing Research. South Western College.
17. Bodnar, S., Mirkovich, I., Koval, V. (2019). Human capital development in Ukrainian education system by means of language integrated teaching. Dilemas contemporaneos-educacion politica y valores, 7 (SI), 14.