Balanced territorial economic development in the conditions of providing stability of human resources management

Anastasiia Bantash; Viktor Koval; Maryna Bashynska; Valentyna Kozlovtseva

doi:10.31520/2616-7107/2020.4.3-6

Anastasiia Bantash Institute of Market Problems and Economic Ecological Research of the NAS of Ukraine, Odesa, Ukraine http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6835-2104
Viktor Koval Odesa Institute of Trade and Economics of Kyiv National University of Trade and Economics, Odesa, Ukraine http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2562-4373
Maryna Bashynska Izmail State University of Humanities, Izmail, Ukraine http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8129-8691
Valentyna Kozlovtseva Odesa State Environmental University, Odesa, Ukraine http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9643-8346

DOI: https://doi.org/10.31520/2616-7107/2020.4.3-6

Abstract

Introduction. Reforming the territorial organization of power on the principles of decentralization is one of the key areas of systemic social transformation in Ukraine. The development of a country is impossible without the development of its regions and depends on how effective and efficient is the management of human resources at the regional and local levels, which act as an economic resource and ensure its social integrity and capacity to implement reforms at the regional level.

Aim and tasks. The purpose of this article is to study the impact of decentralization reforms in Ukraine, in particular its impact on management efficiency and ensuring the stability of human resources development for the balanced development of territorial socio-economic systems.

Results. The paper considers theoretical and practical issues of decentralization as a process that is currently taking place in Ukraine. Emphasis is placed on the fact that decentralization should become a development factor for social, cultural, economic, financial, environmental and other systems, and through these systems a development factor for citizens. At the regional level, it is within the territorial socio-economic systems that human potential is concentrated and human resources are reproduced, which are a source of competitive advantage.

Conclusions. The lack of rational zoning of territories and a balanced administrative-territorial structure is due to the lack of effective regional management, which should be based on the use of improved organizational and economic mechanisms for the development of administrative-territorial units.
In conditions when human resources were considered not as a factor of production, but as an important resource for achieving the goals of the organization, uniting the interests of representatives of united territorial communities becomes the main principle of reproduction of human resources and balanced development of territories. To achieve the self-sufficiency of local self-government, a number of objective and subjective dangers of the development of undesirable political consequences are currently hindered. The decisive factor in overcoming the negative processes in the economy and social life of the country is the formation of personnel policy in a decentralized government, as the ability of government to manage effectively depends on the professional level of its managers.

Keywords:

decentralization of power, local self-government bodies, citizens, provision of conditions, development of human resources, united territorial community.

References

1. Zveryakov, M., Kovalev, A., & Smentina, N. (2017). Strategic planning of balanced development of territorial socio-economic systems in the context of decentralization. Odessa: ONEU.
2. Geets, VM (2000). Instability and economic growth. Kiev. Published by the Institute of Economics. predicted.
3. Gerasymchuk, Z. (2002). Ecological and economic bases of formation and realization of regional policy of sustainable development: (questions of methodology and techniques). Lviv.
4. Ansoff, I. (1989) Strategic management. Moscow. Economics.
5. Mescon, M. X., Albert, M., & Hedouri, F. (2012). Fundamentals of Management. Williams Ltd., Moscow.
6. Sustainable Development Goals (2015). Official site of the United Nations in Ukraine. Retrieved from: http://www.un.org.ua/ua/tsili-rozvytku-tysiacholittia/tsili-staloho-rozvytku.
7. Pavlyuk, A., Oliynyk, D., Batalov, O. (2016). Territorial community as a basic niche of the administrative-territorial system of Ukraine: problems and prospects for reform. Retrieved from: http://old2.niss.gov.ua/content/articles/files/AD-Teritor_alna-gromada-103fe.pdf.
8. Decentralization (2020). Official site to support the decentralization program in Ukraine. Retrieved from: https://decentralization.gov.ua/
9. Alexeev, A., Good, H., & Krutilla, K. (2016). Environmental taxation and the double dividend in decentralized jurisdictions. Ecological Economics, 122, 90-100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.12.004.
10. Balabayeva, Z., & Ponomaryov, V. (2016) Theories of local self-government as a source of its future models searching. Àctual problems of public administration, 1(65), 9-14.
11. Chudyk N. (2017) Decentralization of power - the path to democracy. Retrieved from: http://appj.tneu.edu.ua/index.php/appj/article/view/777
12. De Lima, A., & Toni, F. (2018). The Energy Leviathan: or how US Shales and Brazil Biodiesel Governance Systems Fail to Promote Decentralization, Accountability, Equity, and Society Participation. European Journal of Sustainable Development, 7(3), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.14207/ejsd.2018.v7n3p1
13. De Vries, M. S. (2000), The rise and fall of decentralization: A comparative analysis of arguments and practices in European countries. European Journal of Political Research, 38, 193-224. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.00532.
14. Ministry of Regional Development (2019). Monitoring the process of decentralization of power and reform of local self-government. Retrieved from https://storage.decentralization.gov.ua/uploads/library/file/414/10.06.2019.pdf
15. Gunzenova, K. (2019). Ecological efficiency” as a value criterion of the sustainable development strategy. European Journal of Sustainable Development, 8(2), 217-224. https://doi.org/10.14207/ejsd.2019.v8n2p217.
16. Semenenko, I., Halhash, R., & Ivchenko, Y. (2019). Role of International Organizations in Promoting Sustainable Development in Conflict-Affected Regions: Case of Luhansk Region in Ukraine. European Journal of Sustainable Development, 8(2), 21-34. https://doi.org/10.14207/ejsd.2019.v8n2p21.
17. Onyshchuk, S. V., Onyshchuk, I. I., Siryk, Z. O., & Turenko, V. E. (2020). Practice of Administrative and Territorial Reform in the EU and Ukraine: Regulatory and Management. International Journal of Management, 11(4).
18. Buzko, I., & Semenenko, I. (2017). Goal management of enterprises for sustainable development of a region: issues of institutional support. Visnyk of Volodymyr Dahl EUNU, 6(236), 37-44.
19. Buzko, I., Dyachenko, Y., Petrova, M., Nenkov, N., Tuleninova, D., & Koeva, K. (2016). Artificial Intelligence technologies in human resource development. Computer modelling and new technologies, 20(2), 26-29.
20. Kunce, M., & Shogren, J. (2008). Efficient decentralized fiscal and environmental policy: A dual purpose Henry George tax. Ecological Economics, 65(3), 569-573. Doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.08.004
21. Petrova, M., Koval, V., Tepavicharova, M., Zerkal, A., Radchenko, A., & Bondarchuk, N. (2020). The interaction between the human resources motivation and the commitment to the organization. Journal of Security & Sustainability Issues, 9(3), 897-907.
22. Liakhovych, G., Pavlykivska, O., Marushchak, L., Kilyar, O., & Shpylyk, S. (2019). The organizational-economic aspects of land relations provision by administrative-territorial reform in Ukraine. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 17(2), 479-492.