Prospects of Implementation of Blockchain Technology into Aquaculture Sector of Ukraine


Abstract

Introduction. The development of fish farming in aquaculture in a sustainable way ensures the sustainability of fisheries, which is associated with local problems in each region. Ukraine’s fish production has been falling sharply over the last 30 years, and in 2021 the decline was more than 87 percent in comparison with 1990. In the Ukrainian aquaculture sector, there is a high degree of bureaucracy and risks of corruption, which need to be addressed in order to find a solution for the economy and businessmen. World reports show that Ukraine is among the world's leaders in illegal fishing. Thus, it is highly necessary to implement technologies for sector traceability and transparency, i.e., blockchain.

Aim and tasks. The main aim of this article is to research the possible mechanism of implementation of the transparent and efficient system of using the aquatic bioresources of Ukraine. A secondary aim would be to actualize the information regarding the use of blockchain technology in the aquaculture sector.

Results. This research shows that Ukraine’s aquacultural sector is going through a crisis, which is being induced by the high level of corruption and poaching. The digitization of the aquaculture supply chain powered by blockchain technology has been proposed. The role of blockchain technologies is revealed through functions such as evidence, tamper-proof, transparency, and decentralization. It was investigated the positive impact of blockchain technology on aquaculture business, such as reduction in bureaucracy, quality assurance, improvement in information exchange, low cost of transactions, improvement in audit performance, easy recall process, product origin verification, and low probability of fraudulent activity. It would greatly reduce the time needed to gather all the documentation essential for work and reporting. The blockchain implementation roadmap has been developed, including the following stages: concept, legislation compliance, limited prototype, final vision, further research and optimization.

Conclusions. Blockchain technology fits Ukraine’s economic goals in the long term perspective, such as continued digitalization of the country. Due to the blockchain technology, products of aquaculture would not enter the market unless registered in the unified system. That will influence the reduction of "informal economy" in the sector and the increase of market mechanisms. It will also have a positive influence on food security for the population and economic security for the producers. It will be a precedent for a fully transparent and digitalized field of economy.

Keywords:

blockchain, aquaculture, innovation, traceability, supply chain.

References

Blohmke, J., & Edgren, S. (2019). A joint Deloitte and DNV GL report. Blockchain in the seafood industry: Increasing transparency and efficiency in global seafood supply chains. Retrieved June 20, 2022, from https://safety4sea.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/DNV-GL-Deloitte-Blockchain-in-the-seafood-industry-Increasing-transparency-and-efficiency-in-global-seafood-supply-chains-2019_03.pdf
Croft, G. K. (2021). Blockchain Technology and Agriculture. Congressional Research Service. Retrieved June 20, 2022 from https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/IF/IF11829
Cruz, A. M. R., & Cruz, E. F. (2020). Blockchain-based traceability platforms as a tool for sustainability. In 22st International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems (ICEIS), 2, 330–337.
Dobrovolska, O. V., & Zubko, O. V. (2021). Analysis of fishery enterprises in the context of management of their efficiency. Market Infrastructure, 61, 83-89. https://doi.org/10.32843/infrastruct61-15
Effective management office BRDO (2019). Analysis of fish industry of Ukraine: Green book. Kyiv: Effective management office BRDO (in Ukrainian).
Foerstl, K., Schleper, M. C., & Henke, M. (2017). Purchasing and supply management: From efficiency to effectiveness in an integrated supply chain. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 23, 223-228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pursup.2017.08.004.
García-Oliveira, P., Fraga-Corral, M., Pereira, A. G., Prieto, M. A., & Simal-Gandara, J. (2022). Solutions for the sustainability of the food production and consumption system. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 62(7), 1765-1781. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2020.1847028
Garrard, R., & Fielke, S. (2020). Blockchain for trustworthy provenances: A case study in the Australian aquaculture industry. Technology in Society, 62, 101298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101298
Ge, L., Brewster, C., Spek, J., Smeenk, A., & Top, J. (2017). Blockchain for Agriculture and Food; Findings from the Pilot Study. Wageningen: Wageningen Economic Research, 2017-112. https://doi.org/10.18174/426747
IBM (2018). Digitizing Global Trade with Maersk and IBM. Supply Chain and Blockchain Blog. Retrieved June 20, 2022, from https://www.ibm.com/blogs/blockchain/2018/01/digitizing-global-trade-maersk-ibm.
IUU Fishing Index. (2022). Ukraine. Retrieved June 18, 2022, from https://iuufishingindex.net/profile/ukraine
Kamilaris, A., Fonts, A., & Prenafeta-Boldύ, F. X. (2020). The Rise of Blockchain Technology in Agriculture and Food Supply Chains. Retrieved June 19, 2022, from https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1908/1908.07391.pdf
Kshetri, N. (2018). Blockchain’s roles in meeting key supply chain management objectives. International Journal of Information Management, 39, 80-89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2017.12.005.
Mathisen, M. (2018). The Application of Blockchain Technology in Norwegian Fish Supply Chains: A Case Study (Master's thesis). Norwegian University of Science and Technology. Retrieved June 19, 2022, from https://ntnuopen.ntnu.no/ntnu-xmlui/bitstream/handle/11250/2561323/19772_FULLTEXT.pdf?sequence=1
SourceTrace. (2020). Blockchain for Aquaculture and Fisheries. Retrieved June 19, 2022, from https://www.sourcetrace.com/blog/blockchain-aquaculture-fisheries/
State Agency for Land Reclamation and Fisheries of Ukraine. (2022). Review of aquaculture production in Ukraine for 2020. Retrieved June 18, 2022, from https://darg.gov.ua/_ogljad_virobnictva_produkciji_0_0_0_11113_1.html.
Sylvester, G. (2019). E-agriculture in action: Blockchain for agriculture: Opportunities and challenges. FAO & International Telecommunication Union : Bangkok.
Turk, Ž., & Klinc, R. (2017). Potentials of Blockchain Technology for Construction Management. Procedia Engineering, 196, 638-645. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.08.052.
Vdovenko, N. M., Pavlenko, M. M., & Sinenok, I. O. (2020). The Organizational and Economic Bases for the Development of Fishing and Aquaculture Industry in Ukraine. Business Inform, 4, 221-228. https://doi.org/10.32983/2222-4459-2020-4-221-228
Wassenaer, L., Verdouw, C., & Wolfert, S. (2021). What blockchain are we talking about? An analytical framework for understanding blockchain applications in agriculture and food. Frontiers in Blockchain, 4. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbloc.2021.653128
WWF-New Zealand. (2019). Blockchain Tuna Project. Retrieved June 20, 2022, from https://www.wwf.org.nz/what_we_do/marine/blockchain_tuna_project
Zhang, Y., Liu, Y., Jiong, Z., Zhang, X., Li, B., & Chen, E. (2021). Development and assessment of blockchain‐IoT‐based traceability system for frozen aquatic product. Journal of Food Process Engineering, 44 (5). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfpe.13669
Published
2022-06-30
How to Cite
(1)
Iermakova, O.; Sedikova, I.; Dashian, A. Prospects of Implementation of Blockchain Technology into Aquaculture Sector of Ukraine. Economics Ecology Socium 2022, 6, 29-37.