Demographic Dividend and Labour Market Dynamics: An Empirical Analysis of Socio-Economic Transition and Policy Implications
Abstract
Introduction. Despite macroeconomic improvements, Georgia has faced a persistent negative demographic dividend that has held back economic growth over the past two decades. This study combines dependency ratios, unemployment, self-employment, and informal employment characteristics using an innovative algorithm. Considering its unique informal sector, this approach provides a more realistic picture of Georgia’s demographic and economic dynamics.
Aim and tasks. This study aims to empirically assess the impact of the demographic situation in Georgia on labour market dynamics and the socio-economic transition using a modified algorithm, regression analysis, and CGE modelling to identify necessary reforms and develop evidence-based policy recommendations to facilitate the realisation of the demographic dividend.
Results. The study confirms that, despite GDP and wage growth, Georgia has experienced a persistently negative demographic dividend over the past two decades. Traditional dependency ratios fail to reflect the specifics of Georgia’s highly informal and underemployed labour market. Regression analysis and the Granger causality test show that dependent unemployment and cost increases are the key drivers behind the negative trend. Empirical data show a decline in net demographic returns: -€35.96 million (2002-2012) and -€89.91 million (2013-2023), indicating that employees are unable to pay dependent expenses, especially in 2022. Regression (R² = 96%) confirmed the negative impact of dependency burden and expenses, while the falling birth rate had only a weak offsetting effect. Granger tests revealed that the size of the dependent population, food expenditures and mortality rates predict future dividend values, confirming the relevance of the planning model. Evidence strongly suggests that without structural reforms in labour, social, and health policies and productivity boosts, Georgia’s demographic trends will continue to hinder economic growth rather than support it.
Conclusions. The study concludes that without targeted reforms in the labour market, healthcare, and economic planning, Georgia will not be able to turn demographic changes into economic benefits. The presented model emphasises the influence of demographic factors on socio-economic development and the importance of aligning demographic trends with effective economic policies.
Keywords:
demographic dividend, economic development, labour, regression analysis, employment.References
Bloom, D., Canning, D., & Sevilla, J. (2003). .The demographic dividend: A new perspective on the economic consequences of population change. Rand Corporation.
Caldwell, J. C. (2004). Demographic theory: A long view. Population and Development Review. 30(2), 297–316. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2004.014_1.x
Chandrasekhar, C. P., Ghosh, J., & Anamitra Roychowdhury. (2006). The “Demographic Dividend” and Young India’s Economic Future. Economic and Political Weekly, 41(49), 5055–5064. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4419004
Cylus, J., & Al Tayara, L. (2021). Health, an ageing labour force, and the economy: Does health moderate the relationship between population age-structure and economic growth? Social Science & Medicine. 291, 114353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114353
Headey, D.D. and Hodge, A. (2009). The Effect of Population Growth on Economic Growth: A Meta-Regression Analysis of the Macroeconomic Literature. Population and Development Review, 35, 221-248. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2009.00274.x
Krishnamurty, J., & Kumar, A. (2015). The demographic dividend: challenges to employment and employability. Indian Journal of Labour Economics, 58(1), 43–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41027-015-0008-x
Lee, R., & Mason, A. (2006). What is the demographic dividend. Finance and Development, 43(3), 16-17.
Ludwig, A., Schelkle, T., & Vogel, E. (2012). Demographic change, human capital and welfare. Review of Economic Dynamics, 15(1), 94–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.red.2011.07.001
Maestas, N., Mullen, K. J., & Powell, D. (2023). The effect of population aging on economic growth, the labor force, and productivity. American Economic Journal Macroeconomics, 15(2), 306–332. https://doi.org/10.1257/mac.20190196
Malthus, T. (2023). An essay on the principle of population. In British Politics and the Environment in the Long Nineteenth Century (pp. 77-84). Routledge.
National Statistics Office of Georgia (2024). Population and Demography. Retrieved from https://www.geostat.ge
Ogawa, N., Mansor, N., Lee, S.-H., Abrigo, M. R. M., & Aris, T. (2021). Population aging and the three demographic dividends in Asia. Asian Development Review, 38(1), 32–67. https://doi.org/10.1162/adev_a_00157
Shahidi, F. V., Ramraj, C., Sod-Erdene, O., Hildebrand, V., & Siddiqi, A. (2019). The impact of social assistance programs on population health: a systematic review of research in high-income countries. BMC Public Health, 19(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-6337-1
Sinding, S. W. (2009). Population, poverty and economic development. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 364(1532), 3023–3030. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2009.0145
The National Bank of Georgia. (2024). Statistics data. Retrieved from https://nbg.gov.ge/en/statistics/statistics-data
Tsintsadze, A., Glonti, V., & Ghoghoberidze, T. (2022). Georgia’s reform of the pension system and demographic dividend. The Philippine Statistician (Quezon City), 71(4), 9532–9541.
Weintraub, R. (1962). The birth rate and economic development: An empirical study. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 30(4), 812. https://doi.org/10.2307/1909327
Zhou, J., Deng, J., Li, L., & Wang, S. (2023). The demographic dividend or the education dividend? Evidence from China’s economic growth. Sustainability, 15(9), 7309. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15097309
If the article is accepted for publication in the journal «Economics. Ecology. Socium» the author must sign an agreementon transfer of copyright. The agreement is sent to the postal (original) or e-mail address (scanned copy) of the journal editions.
