Strategic Development of Social Entrepreneurship Mechanisms and Regulation in Biomass Waste Management
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61954/2616-7107/2025.9.4-3Keywords:
Social Entrepreneurship, Biomass, Waste Management, Circular Economy, Environmental Safety.Abstract
Introduction. The environment, which is polluted by biomass waste, high unemployment, primarily in agriculture, and the need for alternative energy sources, requires the search for new organisational forms in the circular economy. Therefore, the issue of social entrepreneurship in biowaste processing is relevant. Research on social entrepreneurship has unique potential for effective biomass waste management, serving as a key catalyst for simultaneously achieving a circular economy and energy transition.
Aim and tasks. The study aims to investigate the strategic development of social entrepreneurship in biowaste management, considering the relationships between financial policy and social and environmental effects, and to develop a model for integrating social enterprises in the biomass management chain.
Results. European social enterprises have developed various innovative business models for biowaste utilisation. Simultaneously, Ukraine is not ready to introduce social enterprises into the waste processing industry. However, correlation analysis confirmed significant multidimensional relationships between the policy of financing biowaste processing and social and environmental effects. The correlation coefficient between biomass fuel consumption and the reduction of carbon dioxide emissions into the atmosphere is 0.985; between the installed capacity of bioenergy equipment and the number of additional jobs is 0.942; and between the volume of recovered biowaste and the level of employment in the industry is 0.978. The low level of social entrepreneurship development in biomass management in Ukraine has led to the development of a model that allows a social enterprise to position itself in the chain of collection, sorting, and logistics of biowaste.
Conclusions. Increased logistics costs and current costs for the collection and disposal of biowaste led to a 15.6-fold reduction in investments in biowaste processing compared with 2015. As a result of a 3.8-fold reduction in the employment growth rate in this sector and a 4.6% reduction in the proportion of biowaste disposal, the importance of social initiatives for the strategic development of entrepreneurship in biowaste management is increasing. The involvement of local communities contributes to the growth of the social effect, and social entrepreneurs can adapt the use of European financial and technical support instruments for the strategic development of social entrepreneurship in biowaste management.
References
Al-Obadi, M., Ayad, H., Pokharel, S., & Ayari, M. A. (2022). Perspectives on food waste management: Prevention and social innovations. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 31, 190–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2022.02.012
Andersson, M., Ljunggren Söderman, M., & Sandén, B. A: (2019). Adoption of systemic and socio-technical perspectives in waste management, WEEE and ELV research. Sustainability, 11(6), 1677. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11061677
Bahrololoum, S., Kermani, M. M. M., & Koohzadi, F. (2022). Ecopreneurs and agricultural waste management. Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, 12(1), 47-51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40497-022-00311-7
Bioenergy Association of Ukraine. (2025). Prospects for the development of the biomass market in the EU and Ukraine. https://uspp.ua/assets/doc/uspp-biomass.pdf
EU4Youth. (2020). Social entrepreneurship in Ukraine: economic and legal analysis. EU NEIGHBOURS east. https://euneighbourseast.eu/news/publications/social-entrepreneurship-in-ukraine-economic-and-legal-analysis/
European Biogas Association (2024). Statistical Report: 2024 European Overview. https://www.europeanbiogas.eu
European Center for Not-for-Profit Law (2021). Promoting Social Entrepreneurship in Ukraine. https://ecnl.org/
European Commission. (2019). The European Green Deal. https://commission.europa.eu/strategy-and-policy/priorities-2019-2024/european-green-deal_en
European Commission. (2024). Circular economy strategy. https://research-and-innovation.ec.europa.eu/research-area/environment/circular-economy/circular-economy-strategy_en
European Compost Network. (2024). Compost Citoyen. https://www.compostnetwork.info
European Environmental Bureau. (2024). Circular Economy. https://eeb.org/work-areas/circular-economy/circular-economy
European Regions Research and Innovation Network (2025). Year in review 2024. https://errin.eu/system/files/2025-02/ERRIN%20Year%20in%20review%202024_2.pdf
Geletukha, G., Zheliezna, T., Matveev, Y., Kucheruk, P., & Kramar. V. (2020). Roadmap for bioenergy development in Ukraine until 2050. UABIO Position Paper № 26 — Kyiv: Bioenergy Association of Ukraine. https://uabio.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/uabio-position-paper-26-en.pdf
Harfadli, M. M., Ulimaz, M., Ramadan, B. S., Rachman, I. & Matsumoto, T. (2025). Understanding the informal waste sector for sustainable waste management using the pressure-state-response framework: a case study in Balikpapan, Indonesia. Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management, 27, 761–776. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-024-02079-2
Hondroyiannis, G., Sardianou, E., Nikou, V., Evangelinos, K., & Nikolaou, I. (2024). Waste generation and macroeconomic drivers: a panel study for European countries and regions. Management of Environmental Quality, 35(5), 1118–1136. https://doi.org/10.1108/meq-08-2023-0297
Interreg Central Europe. (2025). RREUSE. Social and Circular Outlook 2020–2025. https://programme2014-20.interreg-central.eu/Content.Node/SURFACE/Circular-Outlook.html
Kalak, T. (2023). Potential Use of Industrial Biomass Waste as a Sustainable Energy Source in the Future. Energies, 16(4), 1783. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16041783
Karbovska, L., Mazur, J., Zhelezniak, K., Kozlova, A., Melnyk, B., & Skryptsov, S. (2024). Formation of the waste management system in the agricultural sector of the economy of Ukraine: organizational and financial aspects. Financial and Credit Activity Problems of Theory and Practice, 5(58), 367–379. https://doi.org/10.55643/fcaptp.5.58.2024.4462
Mirzoieva, T., Tkach, N., Nitsenko, V., Gerasymchuk, N., Tomashevska, O., & Nechyporenko, O. (2022). Development of the correlation model between biogas yield and types of organic mass and analysis of its key factors. C – Journal of Carbon Research, 8(4), 73. https://doi.org/10.3390/c8040073
Mitzinneck, B. C., & Besharov, M. L. (2019). Managing value tensions in collective social entrepreneurship: The role of temporal, structural, and collaborative compromise. Journal of Business Ethics, 159(2), 381-400. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-4048-2
Nefco. (2021). Opportunities for utilisation of biomass residues in the renewable sector in Ukraine. https://www.nefco.int/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/Finland-Ukraine-TF_Fact-sheet-Utilisation-of-biomass-residues-with-Annexes.pdf
Rahman, A. (2025). Exploring the role of social enterprises in a just transition to the circular economy: A case study of waste management and recycling sector in Indonesia. Open Research Europe, 5(111), 111. https://doi.org/10.12688/openreseurope.19485.1
SALAR International. (2024). WM4U - Waste Management for Ukraine (2024–2027). https://salarinternational.se/salar/whatwedo/allprojects/projects/wm4uwastemanagementforukraine20242027.78433.html
Santander, P., Sanchez, F. A. C., Boudaoud, H., & Camargo, M. (2022). Social, political, and technological dimensions of the sustainability evaluation of a recycling network. A literature review. Cleaner engineering and technology, 6, 100397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clet.2022.100397
Schipfer, F., Pfeiffer, A., & Hoefnagels, R. (2022). Strategies for the mobilization and deployment of local low-value, heterogeneous biomass resources for a circular bioeconomy. Energies, 15(2), 433. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15020433
State Statistics Service of Ukraine. (2025). Capital investments on environmental protection, by type of economic activity and environmental domain. https://www.ukrstat.gov.ua/
Yosep, Y., Mulkhan, U., Hasanudin, U., & Iryani, D. A. (2024). Unleashing the Sustainable Transition of Circular Economy: A Case Study of SMEs Tapioca Industry in Lampung, Indonesia. Circular Economy and Sustainability, 4(4), 3119-3138. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43615-024-00358-6
Zajemska, M., Korombel, A., & Ławińska, O. (2024). Risk Factors for Poland to Achieve the European Commission’s Recycling and Landfill Targets and Their Effects on Waste-to-Energy Conversion: A Review. Energies, 17(5), 1171. https://doi.org/10.3390/en17051171
Zięty, J. J., Olba-Zięty, E., Stolarski, M. J., Krzykowski, M., & Krzyżaniak, M. (2022). Legal Framework for the Sustainable Production of Short Rotation Coppice Biomass for Bioeconomy and Bioenergy. Energies, 15, 1370. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15041370
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Economics Ecology Socium

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
If the article is accepted for publication in the journal «Economics. Ecology. Socium» the author must sign an agreementon transfer of copyright. The agreement is sent to the postal (original) or e-mail address (scanned copy) of the journal editions.



















