Corporate Governance Diversity and Environmental Performance Disclosure in Sustainability Reporting of Industrial Companies
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61954/2616-7107/2025.9.4-4Keywords:
Sustainability Reporting, Integrated Reporting, Environmental Disclosure, Compliance Level, Women on Board.Abstract
Introduction. As sustainability goals have become central to the global agenda, society and government institutions have become increasingly aware of the environment and are increasingly concerned about its challenges. Therefore, regulatory authorities have urged companies to be transparent and accountable for their environmental performances. In this context, increasing the number of women on corporate boards has become a central driver of designing and developing corporate sustainability initiatives.
Aim and tasks. This study examines the impact of corporate board structure and female representation on environmental disclosure, as reported in the activity, sustainability, and integrated reports of 40 manufacturing companies listed on the Borsa Istanbul in 2023.
Results. This study examines the impact of gender diversity, particularly female inclusion in audit committees and the number of female board members, on the level of environmental disclosure in sustainability compliance reports. Multiple regression analysis was employed to evaluate the influence of independent variables on environmental compliance. The study of 40 manufacturing companies listed on the Istanbul Stock Exchange in 2023 found that, on average, these companies had a high level of environmental compliance (mean = 39, range = 6–48), with 58% of the companies having a score of 40 or higher. Regression analysis (R² = 0.207; p = 0.037) showed that board gender diversity (β = 2.931; p = 0.006) had a significant positive effect on environmental disclosure, whereas the number of women on the board and presence in audit committees had no such effect. Content analysis indicates a high degree of compliance in the manufacturing sector. The results indicate that companies with female board members have more tendencies to provide high levels of environmental disclosure.
Conclusions. This study demonstrates that board diversity has a positive impact on companies' environmental performance and reporting practices. However, the number of women on boards and female representation on the audit committee were not statistically significant in relation to the level of compliance with environmental disclosure. Further research is needed to understand how board diversity influences environmental management in various industries and countries.
References
Abdelqader, M., Darwish, T. K., & Nimer, K. (2022). Corporate governance and IFRS in the Middle East: Compliance with international financial reporting standards. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003211556
Adams, M. (2002). The convergence of international corporate governance systems: where is Australia heading? [Series of three parts] Part 1. Keeping Good Companies, 54(1), 14-21. https://search.informit.org/doi/epdf/10.3316/ielapa.200202129
Adams, R. B., & Ferreira, D. (2009). Women in the boardroom and their impact on governance and performance. Journal of financial economics, 94(2), 291-309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2008.10.007
Aksa Acrylic Chemical Industries Inc. (2025). Sustainability Compliance Report, 2024 Annual Period. Kamuyu Aydınlatma Platformu (KAP). https://www.kap.org.tr/en/Bildirim/1393491
Akyuz, B. (2009). Corporate governance regulations in Turkey and corporate governance. Journal of Accounting and Taxation Studies, 2(2), 53-81.
Almaqtari, F. A., Elmashtawy, A., Farhan, N. H., Almasria, N. A., & Alhajri, A. (2024). The moderating effect of board gender diversity in the environmental sustainability and financial performance nexus. Discover Sustainability, 5(1), 318. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-024-00517-7
Aly, D. A. R. M., Hasan, A., Obioru, B., & Nakpodia, F. (2024). Corporate governance and environmental disclosure: a comparative analysis. Corporate Governance, 24(8), 210–236. https://doi.org/10.1108/cg-01-2024-0063
Amran, A., Lee, S. P., & Devi, S. S. (2014). The influence of governance structure and strategic corporate social responsibility toward sustainability reporting quality: Influence of governance structure and strategic CSR on sustainability reporting quality. Business Strategy and the Environment, 23(4), 217–235. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1767
Anazonwu, H. O., Egbunike, F. C., & Gunardi, A. (2018). Corporate board diversity and sustainability reporting: A study of selected listed manufacturing firms in Nigeria. Indonesian Journal of Sustainability Accounting and Management, 2(1), 65-78.
Ararat, M., Aksu, M. H., & Tansel Cetin, A. (2010). The impact of board diversity on boards' monitoring intensity and firm performance: evidence from the Istanbul Stock Exchange. Available at SSRN 1572283. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1572283
Ararat, M., Aksu, M., & Tansel Cetin, A. (2015). How board diversity affects firm performance in emerging markets: Evidence on channels in controlled firms. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 23(2), 83–103. https://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12103
Ayanoğlu, A., Türedi, H. (2022). Historical Development of Corporate Governance in Companies and Motives Behind. Vergi Raporu, 275, (11-29).
Barroso, R., Duan, T., Guo, S. S., & Kowalewski, O. (2024). Board gender diversity reform and corporate carbon emissions. Journal of Corporate Finance, 87, 102616. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2024.102616
Bennouri, M., Chtioui, T., Nagati, H., & Nekhili, M. (2018). Female board directorship and firm performance: what really matters? Journal of Banking & Finance, 88, 267-291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2017.12.010
Bravo, F., & Reguera‐Alvarado, N. (2019). Sustainable development disclosure: Environmental, social, and governance reporting and gender diversity in the audit committee. Business Strategy and the Environment, 28(2), 418-429. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2258
Camilleri, M. A. (2022). Walking the talk about corporate social responsibility communication: An elaboration likelihood model perspective. Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility, 31(3), 649-661. https://doi.org/10.1111/beer.12427
Campbell, K., & Mínguez-Vera, A. (2008). Gender diversity in the boardroom and firm financial performance. Journal of business ethics, 83, 435-451. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9630-y
Carter, D. A., D’Souza, F., Simkins, B. J., & Simpson, W. G. (2010). The gender and ethnic diversity of US boards and board committees and firm financial performance. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 18(5), 396–414. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2010.00809.x
Carter, D. A., Simkins, B. J., & Simpson, W. G. (2003). Corporate governance, board diversity, and firm value. Financial review, 38(1), 33-53. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6288.00034
Cho, C. H., & Patten, D. M. (2007). The role of environmental disclosures as tools of legitimacy: A research note. Accounting, organizations and society, 32(7-8), 639-647. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2006.09.009
Cicchiello, A. F., Fellegara, A. M., Kazemikhasragh, A., & Monferrà, S. (2021). Gender diversity on corporate boards: How Asian and African women contribute on sustainability reporting activity. Gender in Management: An International Journal, 36(7), 801-820. https://doi.org/10.1108/GM-05-2020-0147
Crowther, D. & Seifi S., (2020), Governance and Sustainability, Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-6370-6
Đặng, R., Karmani, M., Houanti, L. H., Simioni, M., & Abid, I. (2023). Board gender diversity and environmental performance: a semi-parametric panel data analysis. Finance Research Letters, 58, 104032. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2023.104032
Daub, C.-H. (2007). Assessing the quality of sustainability reporting: an alternative methodological approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 15(1), 75–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2005.08.013
Deegan, C. (2002). Introduction: The legitimising effect of social and environmental disclosures–a theoretical foundation. Accounting, auditing & accountability journal, 15(3), 282-311. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513570210435852
Deloitte. (2023). Women in the boardroom: A global perspective. https://www2.deloitte.com/global/en/pages/risk/articles/women-in-the-boardroom-global-perspective.html.
Desvaux, G., Devillard, S., Labaye, E., Sancier-Sultan, S., Kossoff, C., & de Zelicourt, A. (2017). Women matter, time to accelerate: Ten years of insights into gender diversity. McKinsey.
Egon Zehnder. (2016). Global Board Diversity Analysis 2016. Egon Zehnder International. https://www.egonzehnder.com.
Epstein, M., Flamholtz, E., & McDonough, J. J. (1976). Corporate social accounting in the United States of America: State of the art and future prospects. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 1(1), 23-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(76)90005-2.
Erhardt, N. L., Werbel, J. D., & Shrader, C. B. (2003). Board of director diversity and firm financial performance. Corporate governance: An international review, 11(2), 102-111. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8683.00011.
Fama, E. F., Jensen, M. C. (1983). Agency problems and residual claims. The Journal of Law and Economics, 26(2), 327-349.
Fernández-Torres, Y., Gallego-Sosa, C., & Gutiérrez-Fernández, M. (2025). Do women board members contribute to companies’ superior environmental performance? A literature review. Review of Managerial Science, 19(5), 1513–1565. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-024-00800-x
García-Sánchez, I. M., Enciso-Alfaro, S. Y., & García-Sánchez, A. (2024). Energy transition disclosures and female directors: Do gender egalitarian societies matter? Journal of Cleaner Production, 480, 144039. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.144039
GMI Ratings. (2013). 2013 Women on Boards Survey. GMI Ratings. https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2013/05/20/2013-women-on-boards-survey
Haniffa, R. M., Cooke, T. E. (2002). Culture, corporate governance and disclosure in Malaysian corporations. Abacus, 38(3), 317-349. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6281.00112
Haniffa, R. M., Cooke, T. E. (2005). The impact of culture and governance on corporate social reporting. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 24(5), 391-430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2005.06.001
Haque, F. (2017). The effects of board characteristics and sustainable compensation policy on carbon performance of UK firms. The British Accounting Review, 49(3), 347-364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2017.01.001
Hollindale, J., Kent, P., Routledge, J., & Chapple, L. (2019). Women on boards and greenhouse gas emission disclosures. Accounting & Finance, 59(1), 277-308. https://doi.org/10.1111/acfi.12258
Issa, A., & Zaid, M. A. (2021). Boardroom gender diversity and corporate environmental performance: a multi-theoretical perspective in the MENA region. International Journal of Accounting & Information Management, 29(4), 603-630. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJAIM-05-2021-0101
Jizi, M. (2017). The influence of board composition on sustainable development disclosure. Business Strategy and the Environment, 26(5), 640-655. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1943
Kılıç, M., & Kuzey, C. (2018). The effect of corporate governance on carbon emission disclosures: Evidence from Turkey. International Journal of Climate Change Strategies and Management, 11(1), 35-53. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCCSM-07-2017-0144
Kılıç, M., Kuzey, C., & Uyar, A. (2015). The impact of ownership and board structure on corporate social responsibility (CSR) reporting in the Turkish banking industry. Corporate Governance, 15(3), 357-374. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-02-2014-0022
Kolk, A. (2005). Sustainability reporting. VBA Journal, 21(3), 34-42.
Kraha, A., Turner, H., Nimon, K., Zientek, L. R., & Henson, R. K. (2012). Tools to support interpreting multiple regression in the face of multicollinearity. Frontiers in psychology, 3, 44. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00044
Krippendorff, K. (2004). Reliability in content analysis: Some common misconceptions and recommendations. Human communication research, 30(3), 411-433. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2004.tb00738.x
Krippendorff, K. (2018). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Sage publications.
Liao, L., Luo, L., & Tang, Q. (2015). Gender diversity, board independence, environmental committee and greenhouse gas disclosure. The British accounting review, 47(4), 409-424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2014.01.002
Low, D. C., Roberts, H., & Whiting, R. H. (2015). Board gender diversity and firm performance: Empirical evidence from Hong Kong, South Korea, Malaysia and Singapore. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 35, 381-401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2015.02.008
Lu, J., & Herremans, I. M. (2019). Board gender diversity and environmental performance: An industries perspective. Business Strategy and the Environment, 28(7), 1449–1464. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2326
Ma, Y., Ahmad, M. I., & Torelli, R. (2024). Board gender diversity and ESG disclosure: The moderating role of audit committee. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 31(6), 5971-5983. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2895
Mahmood, Z. (2017). Environmental performance and firms’ voluntary disclosure: Empirical evidence from Pakistan. Pakistan Journal of Commerce and Social Sciences, 11(2), 653–670. https://hdl.handle.net/10419/188332
Miller, T., & del Carmen Triana, M. (2009). Demographic diversity in the boardroom: Mediators of the board diversity–firm performance relationship. Journal of Management studies, 46(5), 755-786. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00839.x
Modiba, E. M., & Ngwakwe, C. C. (2017). Women on the corporate board of directors and corporate sustainability disclosure, Corporate Board: role, duties and composition, 13(2), 32-37. https://doi.org/10.22495/cbv13i2art3
Moreno-Ureba E, Bravo-Urquiza F, Reguera-Alvarado N (2022) An analysis of the influence of female directors on environmental innovation: When are women greener? J Clean Prod 374:133871. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2022.133871
Mousa, G., Hassan, N.T., et al. (2015) Legitimacy Theory and Environmental Practices: Short Notes. International Journal of Business and Statistical Analysis, 2, 41-53. https://doi.org/10.12785/ijbsa/020104
Muhammad, H., & Migliori, S. (2023). Effects of board gender diversity and sustainability committees on environmental performance: A quantile regression approach. Journal of Management & Organization, 29(6), 1051-1076. https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2022.8
OECD (2004), OECD Principles of Corporate Governance 2004, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264015999-en
Pedhazur, E. J. (1997). Multiple Regression in Behavioral Research: Explanation and Prediction, 3rd Edn. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace.
POA. (2023). International Sustainability Disclosure Standards Published. https://www.kgk.gov.tr
Post, C., Rahman, N., & McQuillen, C. (2015). From Board Composition to Corporate Environmental Performance Through Sustainability-Themed Alliances. Journal of Business Ethics, 130(2), 423–435. http://www.jstor.org/stable/24703477
Rjiba, H., & Thavaharan, T. (2022). Female representation on boards and carbon emissions: International evidence. Finance Research Letters, 49, 103079. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2022.103079
Rouf, P., & Abdur, M. (2011). The corporate social responsibility disclosure: A study of listed companies in Bangladesh. Dr. Md. Abdur, The Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure: A Study of Listed Companies in Bangladesh. Business and Economics Research Journal, 2(3), 19-32. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2568479
Saidon, I. M., & Ab Ghani, N. (2020). How does organizational ethical climate affect interpersonal deviance? The role of moral disengagement. In Ethics, Governance and Risk Management in Organizations (pp. 3-20). Singapore: Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-1880-5_1
Skouloudis, A., Evangelinos, K., Kourmousis, F. (2009). Development of an Evaluation Methodology for Triple Bottom Line Reports Using International Standards on Reporting. Environmental Management, 44(2), 298-311. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-009-9305-9
Srinidhi, B. I. N., Gul, F. A., & Tsui, J. (2011). Female directors and earnings quality. Contemporary accounting research, 28(5), 1610-1644. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1911-3846.2011.01071.x
Terjesen, S., Couto, E. B., & Francisco, P. M. (2016). Does the presence of independent and female directors impact firm performance? A multi-country study of board diversity. Journal of Management & Governance, 20(3), 447–483. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-014-9307-8
Trireksani, T., Djajadikerta, H. G., Kamran, M., & Butt, P. (2024). The impact of country characteristics on board gender diversity and sustainability performance: a global perspective. Sustainability, 16(7), 3057. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16073057
Wang, Y., Ones, D. S., Yazar, Y., & Mete, I. (2023). Board gender diversity and organizational environmental performance: An international perspective. Current Research in Ecological and Social Psychology, 5, 100164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cresp.2023.100164
Wasiuzzaman, S., & Wan Mohammad, W. M. (2020). Board gender diversity and transparency of environmental, social and governance disclosure: Evidence from Malaysia. Managerial and decision economics, 41(1), 145-156. https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.3099
Weber, R. P. (1990). Basic Content Analysis. Sage Publications, Inc.
Xu, B., Jamal, N. M., Liu, Y., & Yahya, T. B. (2025). Board Diversity and Environmental Disclosure: A Review, Current Insights, and Emerging Trends. Sustainability, 17(3), 1211. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17031211
YASED. (2016, April). Women in Top Management Increasing Representation Practices and Recommendations. https://yased-api.yased.org.tr/Uploads/Reports/9bf410f1-a8be-40fe-8d03-7e7c5a3bcf4a.pdf
Zampone G, Nicolò G, Sannino G, De Iorio S (2024), "Gender diversity and SDG disclosure: the mediating role of the sustainability committee". Journal of Applied Accounting Research, Vol. 25 No. 1 pp. 171–193, https://doi.org/10.1108/JAAR-06-2022-0151
Zharfpeykan, R., & Bai, Y. (2025). Board gender diversity and corporate environmental, social and governance performance: evidence from New Zealand listed firms. Pacific Accounting Review, 37(2), 243–270. https://doi.org/10.1108/par-01-2024-0011
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Economics Ecology Socium
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
If the article is accepted for publication in the journal «Economics. Ecology. Socium» the author must sign an agreementon transfer of copyright. The agreement is sent to the postal (original) or e-mail address (scanned copy) of the journal editions.
