Organisational Ethics and Corporate Social Responsibility in European Business: Regional Variations and Strategic Impacts on Sustainability
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61954/2616-7107/2026.10.1-6Keywords:
Organizational Ethics, CSR, Sustainable Governance, Stakeholder Engagement, European Business.Abstract
Background. In a time marked by globalisation, environmental challenges, and rising social expectations, European businesses face increasing pressure to align profitability with ethical responsibility and sustainable development.
Purpose. This study analyses how organisational ethics and corporate social responsibility (CSR) are integrated into European business strategies and assesses their strategic impact on sustainability and competitiveness with a focus on Romania. The study analyses the conceptualisation of CSR, the evolution of sustainability reporting in Europe (2010–2025), compared regional models, and conducted a sectoral analysis that considered changes in EU legislation.
Findings. The study applies a mixed-methods approach, combining quantitative analysis of CSR indicators, such as sustainability reporting rates, performance metrics, and policy data (2010-2025), with qualitative case studies and comparative assessments at the firm and sector levels. CSR has evolved from a voluntary, philanthropic concern into a strategic necessity. Across Europe, 82% of major firms now issue sustainability reports, while Romania’s reporting rate among large companies rose to 74% by 2022, signalling rapid but still incomplete convergence with Western standards and proving the persistence of significant regional differences. CSR and ethics improve innovation capacity, risk mitigation, stakeholder trust and are positively associated with long-term competitiveness.
Implications. Corporate social responsibility and organisational ethics have become core drivers of long-term competitiveness in European markets. However, persistent regional disparities mean that Western Europe operates with mature and stakeholder-oriented corporate social responsibility models. In contrast, in Romania, social responsibility remains an emerging component of organisational culture, primarily driven by EU integration and regulatory pressures. For Romania, sustainable success will depend on deepening the transition from formal compliance to genuinely embedding ethical and sustainable business practices.
References
Aguinis, H., & Glavas, A. (2012). What We Know and Don’t Know About Corporate Social Responsibility: A Review and Research Agenda. Journal of Management, 38(4), 932-968. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206311436079
Bucharest Stock Exchange. (2025). BVB Corporate Governance Code: 2025 Revision and ESG Integration. https://www.bvb.ro/Regulations/LegalFramework/BvbRegulations
Cioca, L.-I., Ivascu, L., Turi, A., Artene, A., & Găman, G. A. (2019). Sustainable Development Model for the Automotive Industry. Sustainability, 11(22), 6447. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11226447
CSR Europe. (2020). The State of CSR Reporting in Europe. https://www.csreurope.org
Danone. (2023). Danone Climate Transition Plan 2023. https://www.danone.com/content/dam/corp/global/danonecom/about-us-impact/policies-and-commitments/en/danone-climate-transition-plan-2023.pdf
Deegan, C. M. (2019). Legitimacy theory: Despite its Enduring Popularity and Contribution, Time is Right for a Necessary Makeover. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 32(8), 2307–2329. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-08-2018-3638
DiMaggio, P.J. and Powell, W.W. (1983) The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields. American Sociological Review, 48, 147-160. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101
Dobre, C., Baba, C. M., Anton, C. E., Zamfirache, A., & Aldea, D. (2025). Sustainability Reporting and Environmental Responsibility: The Case of Romania. Administrative Sciences, 15(3), 103. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci15030103
European Commission. (2023). Country Report on Sustainable Business Practices 2023. European Commission. https://economy-finance.ec.europa.eu/publications/2023-country-report-romania_en
European Commission. (2025). Contributions to Thematic Reports and Policy Documents. https://joint-research-centre.ec.europa.eu/projects-and-activities/fiscal-policy-analysis/contributions-thematic-reports-and-policy-documents_en
European Commission. (2019). Corporate Sustainability and Responsibility – Corporate social Responsibility/Responsible Business Conduct. https://single-market-economy.ec.europa.eu
European Commission. (2020). Farm to Fork Strategy. https://food.ec.europa.eu/horizontal-topics/farm-fork-strategy_en
European Union. (2014). Directive 2014/95/EU. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2014/95/oj/eng
European Union. (2022). Directive (EU) 2022/2464. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2022/2464/oj/eng
Eurostat. (2023a). Food Waste and Food Waste Prevention – Estimates. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?oldid=578564
Eurostat. (2023b). Food waste: 132 kg per inhabitant in the EU in 2022. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/products-eurostat-news/w/ddn-20240927-2
Eurostat. (2025). Environmental Economy – Statistics on Employment and Growth. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained
Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Pitman.
Grigore, G., Molesworth, M., Vontea, A., Basnawi, A. H., Celep, O., & Jesudoss, S. P. (2021). Corporate Social Responsibility in Liquid Times: The Case of Romania. Journal of Business Ethics, 174(4), 763–782. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-021-04926-w
Harrison, J. S., & Bosse, D. A. (2013). How Much is Too Much? The Limits to Generous Treatment of Stakeholders. Business Horizons, 56(3), 313–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2013.01.014
Horváth, R., & Csíki, O. (2025). Drivers for Corporate Social Responsibility: Analysis of Romanian Companies. Journal of East European Management Studies, 30(1), Article 39356. https://doi.org/10.31083/jeems39356
Koleva, G., & Meadows, M. (2021). Inherited Scepticism and Neo-communist CSR-Washing: Evidence from a Post-communist Society. Journal of Business Ethics, 174(4), 783–804. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-021-04929-7
KPMG. (2022). Survey of Sustainability Reporting 2022. https://kpmg.com/xx/en/home/insights/2022/10/survey-of-sustainability-reporting-2022.html
KPMG. (2024). The Move to Mandatory Reporting: Survey of Sustainability Reporting Executive Summary. https://hub.kpmg.de/en/the-move-to-mandatory-reporting
Matten, D., & Moon, J. (2008). “Implicit” and “Explicit” CSR: A Conceptual Framework for a Comparative Understanding of Corporate Social Responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 33(2), 404–424. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2008.31193458
Mironescu, R., & Feraru, A. (2012). E.U.’s Strategy of Building a Knowledge Economy. Studies and Scientific Researches. Economic Edition, 16-17, 147-152. https://doi.org/10.29358/sceco.v0i16-17.91
Mironescu, R., & Feraru, A. (2013). The social responsibility of the Romanian companies, an organizational component of the new culture. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference in Business Excellence (Vol. I, pp. 314-318). Bucharest.
Nestlé. (2024). Annual Review 2024. https://www.nestle.com/sites/default/files/2025-02/annual-review-2024-en.pdf
Nielsen. (2022). Global Consumer Sustainability Survey 2022: The State of Conscious Consumption. https://www.nielsen.com/insights/2022/sustainability-how-to-build-consumer-trust/
Panainte, M., Nedeff, V., & Mosnegutu, E. (2020). The Role of Cultural Factors in Shaping CSR Practices: A Comparative Study of Eastern and Western European Companies. European Management Review, 17(1), 210-225. https://doi.org/10.1111/emre.12353
Porter, M., & Kramer, M. (2011). Creating Shared Value: How to Reinvent Capitalism and Unleash a Wave of Innovation and Growth. Harvard Business Review, 89, 62-77.
Primec, A., & Belak, J. (2022). Sustainable CSR: Legal and Managerial Demands of the New EU Legislation (CSRD) for the Future Corporate Governance Practices. Sustainability, 14(24), 16648. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142416648
PrimeGlobal. (2024). ESG Reporting Now Business as Usual for Top Companies. https://www.primeglobal.net/news/esg-reporting-now-business-as-usual-for-top-companies
Qureshi, N. (2025). The Growing Significance of Corporate Social Responsibility: From Ethical Obligation to Strategic Imperative. International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research (IJFMR), Volume 7 (3). https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2025.v07i03.48259
Schiopoiu Burlea, A., Popa, I. (2013). Legitimacy Theory. In: Idowu, S.O., Capaldi, N., Zu, L., Gupta, A.D. (eds) Encyclopedia of Corporate Social Responsibility. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-28036-8_471
Stoyanov, P. (2025). Corporate Social Responsibility and Strategic Management of Business Development in Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises. Economics Ecology Socium, 9(3), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.61954/2616-7107/2025.9.3-1
Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571-610. https://doi.org/10.2307/258788
Sustainability Index. (2023). Romanian CSR Index, Empirical Insights Regarding Romanian Companies’ Preparedness for CSRD. https://sustainabilityindex.ro/romania-cst-index-2023
Yan, X., Espinosa-Cristia, J. F., Kumari, K., & Cioca, L. I. (2022). Relationship between Corporate Social Responsibility, Organizational Trust, and Corporate Reputation for Sustainable Performance. Sustainability, 14(14), 8737. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14148737
Yardımcı, B., & Aslanertik, B. E. (2025). Corporate Governance Diversity and Environmental Performance Disclosure in Sustainability Reporting of Industrial Companies. Economics Ecology Socium, 9(4), 44-62. https://doi.org/10.61954/2616-7107/2025.9.4-4
Zemanová, Š., & Druláková, R. (2020). Mainstreaming Global Sustainable Development Goals through the UN Global Compact: The Case of Visegrad Countries. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 13(3), 41. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm13030041
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Economics Ecology Socium
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
If the article is accepted for publication in the journal «Economics. Ecology. Socium» the author must sign an agreementon transfer of copyright. The agreement is sent to the postal (original) or e-mail address (scanned copy) of the journal editions.
