Tax Factors of Economic Dynamics: Analysis Based on the Modified IS–LM Model

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61954/2616-7107/2026.10.1-11

Keywords:

Business Cycles, IS-LM Model, Fiscal Policy, Market Equilibrium, System Dynamics.

Abstract

Background. Taxation is a fundamental instrument of macroeconomic policy, and its influence across various economic and social domains remains one of the most significant subjects of research. Particular attention is devoted to examining the capacity of taxation to regulate economic cycles, shape dynamic processes, and affect the market equilibrium of an economic system. The development of dynamic models of economic equilibrium incorporating endogenous tax factors as a methodological foundation for macroeconomic policy constitutes a significant research objective.

Purpose. This study examines the impact of taxation indicators on macroeconomic dynamics within the dynamic IS–LM framework, incorporating endogenous taxes, mathematical and simulation analyses of oscillatory conditions, and assessment of the influence of tax variables on dynamic regimes.

Findings. This study presents a modified IS-LM model with endogenous taxes, demonstrating the potential influence of taxation on the type of dynamics of economic systems, particularly the exit from the fluctuation zone and vice versa. The theoretical analysis of the model consists of two stages: 1) mathematical analysis of the tax parameter’s influence on the type of dynamics of the economic system, and 2) simulation analysis based on the System Dynamics concept. As a result of the first stage, mathematically justified bounds for the tax rate were obtained, which determine its potential (in combination with other parameters) to reflect the diversity of economic systems. In particular, it is shown that for certain values of other model parameters, the transition from fluctuations is possible with both a high tax burden (e.g. above 50%) and a low one (e.g. 20% or below).

Implications. The simulation model developed using the System Dynamics concept demonstrates the possibility of analysing feedback loops that include key variables of the model, revealing reinforcing or balancing mechanisms within closed chains of endogenous variables, and of multivariate calculations and analysis of the impact of various combinations of exogenous parameters on selected response functions (GDP or Interest rate) with the subsequent development of regression meta-models.

References

Altar, M. (2008). A Dynamic IS-LM Model with Adaptive Expectations. SSRN. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1150178

Bazán Navarro, C. E., & Benazic Tomé, R. M. (2022). Structural stability analysis in a dynamic IS-LM-AS macroeconomic model with inflation expectations. International Journal of Differential Equations, 2022, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/5026061

Das, R. C., Chatterjee, T., & Ivaldi, E. (2024). Revisiting policy combinations under IS–LM–EE framework introducing capacity utilization. Quality & Quantity, 58(1), 903–932. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-023-01676-x

De Cesare, L., & Sportelli, M. (2005). A dynamic IS-LM model with delayed taxation revenues. Chaos, Solitons, and Fractals, 25(1), 233–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2004.11.044

Fritsche, U., & Größl, I. (2010). New Keynesian DSGE Models and the IS-LM Paradigm (IMK Working Paper, No. 1/2010). Hans-Böckler-Stiftung, Institut für Makroökonomie und Konjunkturforschung (IMK). https://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:101:1-201101312792

Gali, J. (1992). How well does the IS-LM model fit postwar U.S. data? The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107(2), 709–738. https://doi.org/10.2307/2118487

Hicks, J. R. (1937). Mr. Keynes and the “Classics”: A Suggested Interpretation. Econometrica, 5, 147-159. https://doi.org/10.2307/1907242

King, R. (2000) The New IS-LM Model: Language, Logic, and Limits. Economic Quarterly, Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond, 86, 45-103.

Li, H., & Wu, X. (2015). IS-LM paradigm in macroeconomics: A survey and evaluation. Theoretical Economics Letters, 05(02), 296–303. https://doi.org/10.4236/tel.2015.52035

Muslim, M., Bata Ilyas, M. F. G., & Sani, A. (2024). Linking fiscal policy to economic stability through financial sustainability. Vifada Management and Social Sciences, 2(2), 36–55. https://doi.org/10.70184/yessman2024

Neamtu, M., Opris, D., & Chilarescu, C. (2005). Hopf bifurcation in a dynamic IS-LM model with time delay. In arXiv [math.DS]. https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.MATH/0511322

Panzaru, C., Belea, S., & Jianu, L. (2025). Delayed taxation and macroeconomic stability: A dynamic IS–LM model with memory effects. Economies, 13(7), 208. https://doi.org/10.3390/economies13070208

Potrafke, N. (2025). The economic consequences of fiscal rules. Journal of International Money and Finance, 153, 103286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jimonfin.2025.103286

Smith, G. (1982). Flexible policies and IS-LM dynamics. Journal of Macroeconomics, 4(2), 155–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/0164-0704(82)90119-7

Tu, P. N. V. (1994). Dynamical systems: An introduction with applications in economics and biology (2nd ed.). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-78793-5

Varghese, L., & Saxena, S. P. (2025). Assessing the Global Research Landscape on Fiscal Sustainability (1976–2023): A Scopus-Based Bibliometric Analysis. Asian Journal of Managerial Science, 14(2), 53–65. https://doi.org/10.70112/ajms-2025.14.2.4314

Vergés, J. (2024). Deconstructing the macroeconomics’ IS-LM model: Its assumptions and simplifications. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4688399

Villani, S., & Viscolo, M. (2021). Taxation of global commons as a tool to reduce economic inequalities and strengthen the resilience of tax systems. In The Palgrave Handbook of Climate Resilient Societies (pp. 2253–2278). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42462-6_88

von Holle, V. (2024). The theory of the IS-LM curve and the IS-LM model. In New Economic Theory (pp. 87–106). Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-45136-3_6

Wu, J. C., & Xie, Y. (2025). Unconventional monetary and fiscal policy. Review of Economic Dynamics, 56(101259), 101259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.red.2024.101259

Young, W., & Zilberfarb, B.-Z. (Eds.). (2001). IS-LM and modern macroeconomics (2000th ed.). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0644-6

Zhou, L., & Li, Y. (2008). A generalized dynamic IS-LM model with delayed time in investment processes. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 196(2), 774–781. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2007.07.008

Downloads

Published

2026-03-28

How to Cite

(1)
Merkulova, T.; Bitkova, T.; Nikolaeva, O.; Stetsenko, T. Tax Factors of Economic Dynamics: Analysis Based on the Modified IS–LM Model. ees 2026, 10, 176-185.