Analysis of indicators impact on economic security of enterprises in the context of socio-humanitarian components


Abstract

Introduction. The level of economic security of enterprises is characterized by many indicators. The assessment of the state of economic security of enterprises is carried out through a system of criteria and indicators. The criterion of enterprises economic security is a measure of the state of the entity in terms of compliance with the established indicators of its activity with pre-established indicators reflecting the essence of economic security. Therefore, the problem of analyzing indicators of enterprises economic security and developing measures to improve their economic component in the context of the socio-humanitarian component.

Aim and tasks. Justification of the need to develop measures to improve the assessment of economic security of enterprises based on the impact of indicators in the context of the socio-humanitarian component. On the basis of this goal, the question arises of solving such problems as: the possibility of developing a unified conceptual approach and tools for assessing the impact of indicators on the organization's economic security; developing measures to improve the economic component of enterprises in the context of the socio-humanitarian component.

Results. For the analysis of the economic security state, indicators were chosen that characterize economic security in different spheres of enterprise activity according to the recommendations. For each indicator a matrix of values with the enterprises and indicators of values by years was formed. The analysis uses a multidimensional logit model, a case of binary selection. The model does not take into account group effects, that is, there is no analysis of fixed effects. In order to avoid cross-effects, when not only the variable itself influences the likelihood of a crisis, but the public crisis begins to affect the behavior of the variable, two groups of models are built: for the first group of regressions from the sample, all observations after the first year of crises are excluded; for the second group of regressions all data were used except for the crisis years after the first year of the crisis.

Conclusions. Based on the analysis of the investigated indicators and the determination of t the parameters of enterprises economic security in addition to economic methods, administrative and socio-psychological means can be used. They include methods of influencing individual workers, groups of employees or the collective as a whole to form a corporate culture that will help achieve the goals of this enterprise, will reduce the impact of socio-humanitarian factors of economic security on the enterprise. These methods include: training staff rules of safe behavior; work with managers, whose behavior serves as a reference for the company's staff; development of a program of work with new employees and its implementation; formation and adjustment of traditions of the enterprise; regulation of interpersonal and intergroup relations; moral encouragement; social planning; other methods. Quick methods for certain enterprises were also proposed to improve the economic component of their operation.

Keywords:

economic security, energy security, state regulation, national economy

References

1. Zubok, M. I. (2003) Banking safety: a manual for independent study of discipline. Kiev: KNEU [in Ukrainian].
2. Moiseienko, I.P., Demchyshyn, M.I. (2011) Methodological bases for measuring the level of economic security of the state. Aktualni problemy ekonomiky, №10(124), 90–98 [in Ukrainian].
3. Baldwin, D. A. (2014). The Concept of Security. Review of International Studies, 23 (1), 5-26.
4. Vasyltsiv, T. H. (2008). Economic security of Ukraine's entrepreneurship: a strategy and strengthening mechanism. Lviv: Aral [in Ukrainian].
5. Dovbnia, S. B. Hichova, N.Iu. (2008). Diagnostics of the level of economic security of the enterprise. Finansy Ukrainy, 4, 88-97 [in Ukrainian].
6. Graham, B. Dodd, D. (2009). Security Analysis. The Classic 1934. New York: The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
7. Illiashenko, S. M. (2009). Economic risk: tutorial. Kiev: Tsentr navchalnoi literatury [in Ukrainian].
8. Kleiner, H.B., & Kachalov, P.M. (1997). Enterprise in an unstable economic environment: risks, strategies, security. Moskva [in Russian].
9. Iakubovych, Z. (2010). Formation of the economic security system of the machine-building enterprise. Visnyk TNEU, № 1 81-86 [in Ukrainian].
10. Neu, C. Richard., Jr, Charles Wolf. (1994). The Economic Dimensions of National Security, RAND. 86.
11. Chubai, V.M. (2011). Factor model for assessing the competitiveness of machine-building enterprises. Aktualni problemy ekonomiky, № 6 (96), 156-163 [in Ukrainian].
12. Reznikov, O.L. (2011). Formation of economic security of an industrial enterprise. Extended abstract of candidate’s thesis.Mariypol: ONTU [in Ukrainian].
13. Matviichuk, L.O. (2011). Formation and optimization of the structure of capital in the system of financial security of the enterprise. Extended abstract of candidate’s thesis. Khmelnytskyi: ONTU [in Ukrainian].
14. Bublyk, M., Koval, V. & Redkva, O. (2017) Analysis impact of the structural competition preconditions for ensuring economic security of the machine building complex. Marketing and Management of Innovations, 4, 229-240. doi: 10.21272/mmi.2017.4-20.
15. Nevzorov, V. B. (2000). Mathematical theory. Moskva: FAZIS [in Russian].
16. Vivchar O. I. (2018). Management of economic safety of enterprises: socio-humanitarian contexts. Ternopil: FOP Palianytsia V. A. [in Ukraine].
Published
2018-11-14
How to Cite
(1)
Vivchar, O.; Redkva, O. Analysis of Indicators Impact on Economic Security of Enterprises in the Context of Socio-Humanitarian Components. Economics. Ecology. Socium 2018, 2, 65-74.
Section
Market mechanisms of entrepreneurship development